Why do three AIs give drastically different answers to the same question?

This article uses the analogy of "personality differences" to describe large AI models (GPT's logic, Claude's emotion, and Gemini's internet savvy). It provides examples from four dimensions: language style, reasoning, creativity, and knowledge coverage, offering scenario-based usage suggestions and introducing DiffMind to help with comparison and selection. This approach is suitable for ordinary users who want to improve their AI usage efficiency.
用 AI 写方案总踩坑?3 个 “让答案更靠谱” 的实操技巧

Struggling with AI-powered solutions? Here are 3 practical tips to make your answers more reliable.

This article shares three practical techniques to make AI answers more reliable: asking questions from a different angle (adding qualifiers), having multiple AIs compete against each other (cross-validation), and completing the logical chain (step-by-step guidance). It is suitable for writers, students, and professionals, helping to avoid a single perspective and improve the quality of decision-making. The article naturally leads to DiffMind's ability to help achieve multi-dimensional comparisons at the end.
问同一个问题,为什么要多看 3 个 AI 的答案?

Why look at the answers from three different AIs when asking the same question?

This article uses real-life examples from international students and creators to explain the "perspective differences" of different AI answers, uses the analogy of "friends giving advice" to illustrate the value of multiple answers, emphasizes that multi-perspective thinking can improve the reliability of decision-making, and introduces DiffMind to help ordinary users easily compare answers from multiple models.
内容创作卡壳了?真实案例看DiffMind 如何帮你 “拼” 出灵感

Stuck on a creative block? See real-world examples of how DiffMind helps you "piece together" your inspiration.

Using DiffMind for content creation, with multi-model AI (GPT/Claude/Gemini) on the same screen for comparison, helps you solve the problem of getting stuck when writing scripts and copy. It can create efficient content with "framework + case + interaction" in 5 minutes, making creation faster, more stable, and more inspiring. It is suitable for self-media creators, writers, etc.