Last week, I helped a friend revise her short video script. She used three AI programs to write copy for "Rejecting Involution":
- GPT provides a "logical framework": "The essence of involution is limited resources, and the solution is to enhance self-worth."
- Claude wrote an “emotional story”: “Like flowers by the roadside, each has its own season, why compare the blooming time with others”;
- Gemini played on the meme: "Your deskmate, the 'King of Currying,' is saying 'Ah~ I'm studying until 3 o'clock' again when you're reciting your lessons. Stop currying and let's 'slack off' together."
It turns out that AI is not a "panacea," but rather a "thinker with different personalities."“Some excel at logic, some at emotion, and some at being relatable—understanding these differences is key to enabling AI to truly help you.
I. The "Personality Differences" of Large AI Models: Understanding Their Strengths from Four Dimensions
Just as doctors, teachers, and journalists each have their own specialties, large-scale AI models also have their own "capability maps." Focus on these four dimensions:
1. Language style: Some are "rigorous," some are "lively," and some are "literary."“
- GPTLike a "rigorous academic," they speak in an organized manner with a clear logical chain. For example, when writing a paper, they will divide it into "first, second, and last," but they lack a bit of "down-to-earth" feel (Claire said: "They can outline the main points, but they can't find any examples from 3 years ago").
- ClaudeLike a "warm storyteller," they excel at touching people with details. When writing copy, they might say, "The loneliness of pet owners is like a bowl of hot soup after working overtime late at night," but the logical chain can sometimes be a bit convoluted (Ava says, "Its emotional copy can make people cry, but explaining 'why involution' always feels like telling a story").
- GeminiLike a "lively internet celebrity", she speaks with witty remarks and is good at capturing the attention of young people. When writing short video scripts, she will use phrases such as "@Juanwang's deskmate" and "who among the family understands?", but her logic is sometimes "unsound" (Jason commented: "She can write 'the resignation-style re-rolling', but she can't explain 'why resignation is right'").
2. Reasoning ability: Some are "steady, accurate, and decisive," while others are "prone to divergent thinking."“
- DeepSeekLike a "data calculator," it's incredibly accurate at calculating costs and prioritizing tasks (as Ethan, a user operations manager, said: "Using it for event budgeting, it can even accurately calculate whether the shipping cost includes tax").
- GPTLike a "framework builder," it breaks down complex issues very clearly. For example, when analyzing "metaverse education," it will first explain "technical principles → application scenarios → advantages and disadvantages," but the detailed data may not be up-to-date (international student Claire complained: "It can talk about 'VR classroom cases in 2020,' but it doesn't know about the new developments in 2023").
- GeminiLike a "brainstorming machine," it excels at association and innovation, but its reasoning occasionally "skips steps" (entrepreneur Eric said: "It can associate 'pet supplies' with 'pet social networking,' but it doesn't explain 'how to get users to pay for social features'").
3. Creativity: Some are "profound," while others "know how to use internet slang."“
- ClaudeLike an "artistic creator," it writes emotional copy and brand stories with a particularly vivid imagery (as influencer Ava said, "It can capture the 'loneliness' of 'pet-themed hoodies,' reminding me of the companionship of pet owners late at night").
- GeminiLike "hotspot catcher," it is good at combining popular memes and internet savvy. For example, when writing about "young people lying flat," it would use "'lying flat is not giving up, it is 'I am in charge of my time'" but the depth may not be enough (Jason said: "Its jokes are very popular, but it cannot explain the social pressure behind lying flat").
- GPTLike "framework creatives," they can create "logical creative ideas," such as writing "workplace anti-involution solutions," which are divided into "mindset adjustment → time management → skills improvement," but they are not interesting enough (copy editor Jason said: "Its solutions are very correct, but they are like 'textbooks,' and no one wants to share them").
4. Knowledge Coverage: Some are "old and comprehensive," while others are "new and specialized."“
- GPTLike an "encyclopedia," it covers a wide range of fields, from history to technology, but the "new data" in some fields is lagging behind (for example, in Claude's case, GPT's "2020 case" is not as good as Claude's "new trends in 2023").
- ClaudeLike "humanities observers," they have a deep understanding of psychology and sociology. For example, when writing "A Psychological Analysis of Rejecting Involution," they would approach it from the perspectives of "self-identity" and "social comparison" (Product Manager Leo said: "It can explain 'why people get caught in involution,' which is more convincing than simply saying 'Don't get caught in involution'").
- GeminiLike a "trendsetter," it is particularly sensitive to internet hotspots and youth culture. For example, it knows that "'PetShaming' is a new meme in 2024" (entrepreneur Eric said: "It can help me combine 'pet Chinese trend' with 'young people's pet-owning psychology,' making the solution more user-friendly").
II. How to Choose the Right AI? Tailor your approach to the specific scenario.“
Just as you use fever reducers for a fever and cough suppressants for a cough when you have a cold, AI also has "scenario adaptation":
- Writing papers/reports: Choose GPT (logically rigorous, but have Claude provide additional case studies);
- For writing emotional copy/story: Choose Claude (the details are touching, but have Gemini add catchy phrases);
- For writing short video scripts/social media: choose Gemini (strong online appeal, but let GPT calculate costs, Claude writes about emotions);
- Calculate data/prioritize: Choose DeepSeek (precise, but let GPT verify the logic).
three,DiffMindLet "AIs with different personalities" serve you.
Previously, I had to switch between three AI platforms to revise a solution. Now, with DiffMind, I can see GPT's logic, Claude's emotions, and Gemini's jokes in one window—it's like having three friends with different personalities "help me come up with a solution together." Leo said, "It's not for speed, but because 'my vision has been broadened.'"
The difference in AI is not the problem; the problem is how to use that difference to solve problems.DiffMind helps you "have multiple thinkers at the same time," allowing you to leverage the strengths of each AI.
