It's a typical Tuesday afternoon: the product you're in charge of has just been updated with a small feature (like "one-click PDF export"), or you've suddenly thought of a golden quote about "managing upwards in the workplace". The mission has arrived: The boss or client may require, based on this point, to produce an in-depth article for a WeChat official account, three articles with different styles for Xiaohongshu (Little Red Book), two short video scripts, and even an outline for a live stream. The current situation is: Your mind is blank.
- Only points, no surface: As I write, I drift off-topic and can't sustain the length of the piece.
- Repeating myself verbatim: Switching to a different platform simply means shortening the text, which users get tired of and results in poor data.
- Format conversion is difficult: Transforming an article into a conversational short video script is even more tiring than rewriting it entirely. At this point, what you need most isn't "inspiration," but a set of...Industrialized expansion process。
My "Personal Safety Net Process": The Formula for Growth from 1 to 6
To solve the problem of "having to start from scratch every time," I established a standardized system. Multi-model AI workflow。
Step 1: Condense your idea into a "one-sentence proposition".“
For example: "Using fragmented time to learn English is actually more efficient."“ Set goals: Xiaohongshu focuses on gaining followers (attracting attention), while WeChat official accounts focus on reputation (depth).
Step 2: Have 6 AIs each claim one of 6 different schools of thought.
Don't let AI do whatever it wants; instead, assign specific "content genres":
- Tutorial Stream: “"A step-by-step guide to memorizing vocabulary in 20 minutes during your commute (with a timetable)."”
- Story Flow: “"Why is my colleague, who only studies for 15 minutes a day, better at English than me?"”
- Listicle: “"5 must-have apps for fragmented learning".”
- Comparison: “"A comparison of the results after 30 days of intensive study versus practicing in short intervals."”
- Challenge Experiment Flow: “"The challenge of studying for seven consecutive days using only fragmented time slots yielded amazing results."”
- Question and Answer Flow (Q&A): “"Can't learn effectively with fragmented learning? You've definitely fallen into these 3 misconceptions."”
Step 3: Standardize Output Requirements
The AI is required to output the following for each solution:Eye-catching headline + logical outline + key examples + material requirements (images/B-roll) + CTA。
Step 4: Synthesize the "Content Matrix Table"“
Choose the 3-4 strongest options and fill them into your weekly update schedule.
DiffMind Practical Application: How to Use Tools to Achieve "Dimensional Reduction Attack"?
Manually making ChatGPT play six roles is very tiring, and its style is difficult to change completely. Using... DiffMind Such multi-model tools will improve efficiency many times over.
1. Parallel expansion: Different models are responsible for different forms.
In DiffMind, you can call different models simultaneously and take advantage of their respective strengths:
- Claude 3.5 Sonnet: It has strong logic and is very suitable for writing.Long articles and in-depth tutorials。
- GPT-4o: Strong overall abilities, suitable for writingList Stream and Comparison Stream。
- Gemini / Llama: Good at brainstorming ideas, suitable for writingCreative Challenge Script。 Practical application: Enter the same brief, and within seconds you'll see a rigorous tutorial and a sentimental story generated simultaneously.
2. Enhanced Questioning: Rejecting "Correct but meaningless statements"“
Much AI-generated content is "too superficial." By using DiffMind's "question enhancement" feature, we can force AI to provide substantial content when expanding upon it.
- Specific examples: Instead of saying "for example, someone," say "for example, Xiao Wang, a 25-year-old newcomer to the workplace."
- Camera rhythm: If it is a script, it must be marked "close-up for the first 3 seconds, then cut to wide shot at the 5th second".
- Verifiable facts: It is necessary to cite real data or theoretical support.
3. LEGO-style assembly: Create the ultimate solution
By comparing the views, you can perform a "stitching operation":
- Take Model A That suspenseful title that makes you want to click.
- Take Model B That logically rigorous "script storyboard".
- Take Model C That highly provocative "closing quote". result: You have a comprehensive content solution that offers both high traffic and depth, and is also practical and applicable.
Conclusion
Content creation shouldn't be a gamble of chance, but a sophisticated assembly line. Through this "1 idea × 6 genres × multi-model collaboration" method, you're no longer a creator staring blankly at the screen, but a content commander directing a vast army. Let... DiffMind With our help in completing the basic expansion of 80%, you only need to focus on the final finishing touches of 20%.
