Why are your quotes always criticized for being "illogical"?
In seeking academic writing help In such cases, the feedback given by tutors often focuses on the following structural issues:
- The background is "fake, grandiose, and empty".“It begins with the creation of the world by Pangu, laying the groundwork for half a page before even getting to the main point.
- A mountain of literature, with no gapsIt lists what Zhang San and Li Si said, but doesn't say "what they didn't say" or "what they said was wrong." Without gaps, your research has no reason to exist.
- DisconnectThe background narrative is grand and expansive, but the research questions suddenly become very narrow, lacking logical transitions.
- Lack of RoadmapAfter reading the introduction, the reader still doesn't know the structure of the following article.
Personal safety net process: CARS model + funnel structure hands-on practice
Swales' CARS (Create a Research Space) model is the gold standard for academic writing. Imagine it as a...funnelStart by narrowing your focus from a broad territory to your specific research area. Please copy the following 6 Moves and fill in the provided sentence structure to complete your introduction. (80%)
Move 1: Establish a Territory
- PurposeThis demonstrates the importance of the research field and attracts readers.
- length: 2–4 sentences.
- Versatile sentence structureIn recent years, [Topic] has attracted increasing attention due to its impact on [Context/Field]."The issue of" [Problem] is of central concern to [Stakeholders, eg, policymakers/educators] because [Reason]."”
Move 2: Reviewing Previous Items
- PurposeShow that you have read the book and summarize the main points you have.
- length3–6 sentences (categorized by topic, avoid rambling).
- Versatile sentence structure:"Previous studies have extensively investigated [Aspect A] (Author, Year; Author, Year).” “There is a general consensus among scholars that [Concept] plays a critical role in [Outcome]." "Traditionally, research in this field has focused on [Method/Perspective]."”
Move 3: Indicating a gap – the most crucial step!
- PurposePoint out the shortcomings, controversies, or limitations of previous research to pave the way for your own debut.
- length: 1–3 sentences.
- Versatile sentence structure：”However, strictly speaking, there remains a paucity of evidence regarding [Missing Aspect]." "Despite these findings, few studies have explored [Your Topic] within the context of [Your Specific Context]."Although" [Author] examined [Variable A], the relationship between [Variable A] and [Variable B] remains unclear.”
Move 4: Occupying the Niche
- PurposeThen, state your research goals or questions.
- length: 1–2 sentences.
- Versatile sentence structure：”The primary purpose of this paper is to address this gap by examining [Your Objective]." "Specifically, this study seeks to answer the following research question: To what extent does [Variable X] affect [Variable Y]?"”
Move 5: Methodology Overview (Optional)
- PurposeBriefly mention what data or methods you used (qualitative/quantitative).
- length: 1–2 sentences.
- Versatile sentence structureTo achieve this, a [Methodology, eg, quantitative survey] was conducted involving [Number] participants." "This study utilizes Theoretical Framework to analyze [Data Source]."”
Move 6: Roadmap
- Purpose: To tell the reader what each part will be about.
- length: 2–3 sentences.
- Versatile sentence structure：”The remainder of this paper is organized as follows: Section 2 reviews the relevant literature on [Topic]. Section 3 outlines the methodology. Finally, the results and implications are discussed in Sections 4 and 5.”
DiffMind How to become your writing coach?
With the skeleton in place, it still needs to be filled with flesh. At this point,DiffMind(Multi-model AI comparison tool) can help you... assignment help international students Efficiency has been elevated to a new level. 1. Enhanced Questioning: Transforming "vague questions" into "precise gaps"“ You probably only have a general idea.
- operateIn DiffMind, enter: "My question is about [topic], please generate 3 possible research gaps and corresponding research questions for me."“
- DiffMind AdvantagesIt uses question enhancement features to transform your simple instructions into in-depth instructions that conform to academic standards, helping you find entry points you hadn't thought of before. 2. Multi-model comparison: Refining academic terminology The sentences you filled in yourself may not be idiomatic (Chinglish).
- operatePut the written Move 3 (Gap part) into DiffMind, and call GPT-4 and Claude 3.5 at the same time.
- instruction"Please rewrite this passage to make it more academic and to more powerfully highlight the importance of research."“
- resultCompare the outputs of the two models. Claude is generally more rigorous in its academic logic, while GPT-4's language is more fluent. You can combine the strengths of each to create the best version. 3. Automatic consistency check After writing the introduction, my biggest fear is that it won't match the conclusion that follows.
- operateFeed your Introduction draft and Conclusion draft to DiffMind at the same time.
- instruction"Please check whether the research questions raised in the introduction are clearly answered in the conclusion? Does the roadmap match the actual article structure?"“
- valueIt can act like a rigorous reviewer, helping you to find logical gaps.
Conclusion
Writing an introduction doesn't require talent, just structure. Next time you're staring blankly at a document, open this article, copy the six steps of the CARS model, fill in the blanks, and then polish it with DiffMind. You'll find that what was originally the most difficult part—the introduction—can actually be done in just 30 minutes.
